Irrelevant thoughts of an oracle DBA

21 September 2011

Oracle anounces the Unbreakable DB Appliance

Filed under: infrastructure,opinion,unbreakable db appliance — Freek D'Hooge @ 19:33
Tags: ,

More then 10 years after Oracle’s first appliance attempt with Raw Iron and 3 years after the release of Exadata, Oracle has now announced the Unbreakable DB Applicance.

This “cluster in a box” consists out of a 4 RU chassis, in which 2 server nodes,  96 GB memory per node, 12 TB raw shared disk storage  (24 disks) and 292 GB flash disks has been placed.
The two server nodes have a total of 24 cpu cores, but cores can be disabled.
This allows for sub-capacity licensing of the software (with a minimum of 4 cores).

On the software side, the appliance is running Oracle linux and 11gR2 grid infrastructure and 11gR2 db software. Databases on this appliance can run as single node, RAC or RAC One Node.
Oracle enterprise manager is also part of the software stack.

Claims are made towards one button installation of software and patching.
The appliance has also a “phone home” functionality which automatically creates a service request when a problem is detected.

List price for the hardware is $ 50,000 (regardless of how many cores you activate) and for the software the standard DB licensing applies.
Which means that existing CPU licences can be transferred to this appliance.

Oracle positions this system below the Exadata quarter rack, and it is also worth mentioning that this appliance is not expandable.

So far the product launch information.

Some questions / remarks I have:

  • According to the presentation the hardware price remains the same, regardless of how many cores you activate (namely $ 50,000).
    In my opinion, this means that no one will buy this appliance to just activate 4 cores.
    There are much cheaper solutions when you only need a low number of cores (certainly when you consider that most companies already have a san which can be used for the Oracle databases)
  • There are 24 disks in the appliance, which seems low (certainly compaired to the 24 cpu cores).
    However, keep in mind that this storage is dedicated and probably (I don’t have confirmation on this) capable of asm intelligent data placement and command queuing.
    Normally SAN vendors are using an estimate of 180 IOPS per san disk. Oracle however is using an estimation of 300 IOPS per cell disk for Exadata, and tests done by Glenn Fawcett show that they can actually perform even better (around 400 IOPS).
    Using the number of 300 IOPS, this would mean that the 24 disks translate to 40 SAN disks (that may not used by any other application, so in reality to even more san disks), which already looks very different.Now, I’m still unsure how it will perform with write intensive databases (oltp or dwh), certainly when several databases are consolidated on this appliance.As this appliance is not expandable, the number of disks may be a weak point, compaired to the number of cpu cores.
    I’m hoping that someone like Kevin Closson (poke poke) will be able to shed some light on this, as my knowledge in this area is rather limited :-)
  • In the presentation it was mentioned that the flash storage is used for the redo logs, but it is unclear if it could also be used to store datafiles or as cache (as with the Exadata smart flash cache)

As with many things the proof of the pudding is in the eating, so I’m looking forward to some benchmarks and presentations by real world customers.
And if anyone from Oracle is reading this, you may always send me a demo machine so I can do some testing on my own  ;-))

update 20:12, fixed wrong memory specification


  1. We have a machine that we are doing testing on. We also just hosted a customer of ours in Oracle’s beta program. The OUDA was installed in our data center and remains there currently. Here is a public quote from CallSource, who is convinced from a consolidation perspective, that OUDA is much faster and more efficient at a fraction of the TCO.
    “We ran 9 of the most complex and time consuming processes we perform every day on Oracle’s Unbreakable Database Appliance. Each completed in a fraction of the time it takes to execute them on our existing platforms! The UDA’s 2 RAC and multi proc head room will enable us to do much more, with much less equipment, in much less time! That’s truly great bang for the buck!”

    Jason Scinocca – Chief Technology Officer – CallSource Inc.

    If there is a qualified company with a real interest, we will allow them to test on this machine over a few days. We plan to start releasing benchmarks and details soon.

    Comment by David Crawford — 21 September 2011 @ 20:29 | Reply

    • David,

      Thanks for the feedback, I’m looking forward to those benchmarks.

      Comment by dhoogfr — 21 September 2011 @ 21:50 | Reply

  2. photo frame software free download windows 7

    Oracle anounces the Unbreakable DB Appliance | Irrelevant thoughts of an oracle DBA

    Trackback by wireless printer for windows 10 — 19 October 2017 @ 19:09 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at

%d bloggers like this: